NedaMed
Telephone : +98 (311) 6532771
Fax & Voice Mail : +98 (936) 2619966
info@NedaMed.com
Description/Scope
An implantable infusion pump is intended to provide
long-term, continuous or intermittent drug infusion. This
document addresses the use of implantable infusion pumps.

Position Statement
Medically Necessary:
Implantable infusion pumps are considered medically
necessary when used to deliver drugs for the treatment of:
- Primary liver cancer (intrahepatic artery injection of chemotherapeutic agents);
- Metastatic colorectal cancer where metastases are limited to the liver (intrahepatic artery injection of chemotherapeutic agents);
- Head/neck cancers (intra-arterial injection of chemotherapeutic agents);
- Severe, refractory spasticity of cerebral or spinal cord origin in patients who are unresponsive to or cannot tolerate oral baclofen (Lioresal®) therapy (intrathecal injection of baclofen).
Permanently implanted intrathecal (intraspinal) infusion pumps for the administration of opiates or non-opiate analgesics, in the treatment of chronic intractable pain, are considered medically necessary when:
- Used for the treatment of malignant pain (e.g., pain
associated with cancer) and all of the following
criteria are met:
- Strong opioids or other analgesics in adequate doses, with fixed schedule (not PRN) dosing, have failed to relieve pain or intolerable side effects to systemic opioids or other analgesics have developed; and
- Life expectancy is greater than three (3) months (less invasive techniques such as external infusion pumps provide comparable pain relief in the short term and are consistent with standard of care); and
- Tumor encroachment on the thecal sac has been ruled out by appropriate testing; and
- No contraindications to implantation exist such as sepsis or coagulopathy; and
- A temporary trial of spinal (epidural or
intrathecal) opiates or non-opiate analgesics has
been successful as defined by a 50% reduction in
pain, prior to permanent implantation.
Note: A temporary trial of intrathecal (intraspinal) infusion pumps used for the treatment of malignant pain is considered medically necessary only when criteria 1-4 above are met.
- Used for the treatment of non-malignant pain (e.g.,
pain not associated with cancer) with a duration of
greater than six (6) months and all of the following
criteria are met:
- Documentation, in the medical record, of the failure of six (6) months of other conservative treatment modalities (pharmacologic, surgical, psychologic or physical), if appropriate and not contraindicated; and
- Intractable pain secondary to a disease state
with objective documentation of pathology in the
medical record; and
- Further surgical intervention is not indicated; and
- Psychological evaluation has been obtained and evaluation unequivocally states that the pain is not psychologic in origin and that benefit would occur with implantation; and
- No contraindications to implantation exist such as sepsis or coagulopathy; and
- A temporary trial of spinal (epidural or
intrathecal) opiates or non-opiate analgesics has
been successful prior to permanent implantation as
defined by a 50% reduction in pain and documentation
in the medical record of improved function.
Note: A temporary trial of intrathecal (intraspinal) infusion pumps used for the treatment of non-malignant pain is considered medically necessary only when criteria 1-5 above are met.
Note: When an implantable/intrathecal infusion pump is determined to be medically necessary, the supplies necessary for the proper use of the pump are considered medically necessary.
Investigational and Not Medically Necessary:

Implantable infusion pumps are considered investigational
and not medically necessary for the infusion of heparins for
thromboembolic disease or antibiotics for osteomyelitis.
All other uses of implantable infusion pumps, including
fully implantable insulin pumps, are considered
investigational and not medically necessary.
Rationale
The role of opioid therapy in treatment of pain is well
established in the medical literature. Individuals who have
proven unresponsive to less invasive medical therapy and who
require large doses of opioids may be candidates for an
implantable delivery system that permits intrathecal
administration. This system delivers the opioid directly to
the receptors in the spinal cord, allowing smaller doses to
be used and thereby minimizing side effects. This position
is supported by multiple case control studies.
The use of continuous chemotherapy infusion treatment has
been studied for patients with certain types of cancers,
including, but not limited to, primary hepatic cancer,
metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver, and various head
and neck cancers. This method of chemotherapy infusion has
been found to improve medical outcomes in select individuals
where continuous chemotherapy is believed to be appropriate.
The evidence supporting this conclusion includes multiple
randomized controlled trials. Prospective randomized trials
of individuals with unresectable liver disease have shown
that compared to conventional systemic therapy, hepatic
artery infusion is associated with an increased tumor
response rate.
Implantable pumps for delivery of medication to the
intrathecal space have been developed as an alternative to
chronic systemic administration for the treatment of
spasticity of cerebral or spinal origin. These pumps have
been demonstrated in numerous randomized controlled trials
to reduce adverse effects such as tolerance, dependency, and
neurotoxicity.
The use of implantable pumps for infusion of antithrombotic
medications for thromboembolic disease, or for the infusion
of antibiotics for osteomyelitis, has not been demonstrated
to provide any additional improvement in net health outcomes
above standard care with bolus or subcutaneous drug
administrations. This therapy does not prevent the
occurrence of complications or morbidity nor does it
significantly relieve pain over other less invasive
treatment methods. The risks involved in the implantation
and maintenance of implantable infusion pumps for these
conditions is not outweighed by any potential benefits. The
evidence supporting this conclusion includes multiple case
series studies.
Fully implantable insulin pumps are designed to deliver
insulin via intraperitoneal or intravenous routes in a
programmed and controlled manner to diabetic patients.
However, these pumps have been associated with a high
incidence of device malfunction related to catheter
obstruction, among other malfunctions. Newer devices are
under development that are expected to drastically reduce
the problem of catheter obstruction. With additional
refinements underway, implantable insulin pumps may
eventually prove beneficial in the treatment of insulin
dependent diabetic patients. To show benefit, however,
additional long-term randomized prospective studies are
needed.
top
Background/Overview

Implantable Infusion Pumps
Implantable infusion pump use for the delivery of
intrathecal (intraspinal) opiates is based on the existence
of opioid (narcotic) receptors on the spinal cord to achieve
"selective spinal analgesia" (pain relief). Pumps provide
for the long-term delivery of opioid (narcotic) medication
in the management of malignant (cancer) pain and
nonmalignant (non-cancer) pain. Examples of appropriate
nonmalignant pain syndromes which may be treated with
implantable pumps include "failed back surgery", chronic
arachnoiditis, visceral pain syndromes, post herpetic
neuralgia, phantom limb pain, spinal cord injuries,
peripheral neuropathies and reflex sympathetic dystrophy. A
successful temporary trial of spinal opiates is required
both to evaluate analgesic responsiveness and to increase
the long-term success of the procedure. Individuals must be
closely monitored as conversion from high dose oral or
systemic opioids to spinally administered opioids will
sometimes result in withdrawal symptoms.
Treatment with this therapy should remain a last resort,
used only after all other appropriate therapies have failed.
A permanently implantable drug-infusion system is not
usually appropriate when life expectancy is three months or
less; for such patients, external drug infusion systems can
appropriately provide spinal analgesia and comparable pain
relief.
The implantable infusion pump (IIP) is a drug delivery
system that provides continuous infusion of an agent at a
constant and precise rate. The purpose of an IIP is to
deliver therapeutic levels of a drug directly to a target
organ or compartment. It is frequently used to deliver
chemotherapy directly to the hepatic artery or superior vena
cava.
An IIP is surgically placed in a subcutaneous pocket under
the infraclavicular fossa or in the abdominal wall and a
catheter is threaded into the desired position. A drug is
infused over an extended period of time. The drug reservoir
may be refilled as needed by an external needle injection
through a self-sealing septum in the IIP. Bacteriostatic
water or physiological saline is often used to dilute
therapeutic drugs. A heparinized saline solution may also be
used during an interruption of drug therapy to maintain
catheter patency.
There is a range of totally implanted catheters with
implanted reservoirs and manual pumps as well as totally
implanted catheters with implanted infusion pumps.
Implantable infusion pumps are available in either
programmable or non-programmable models, depending on the
type of medication delivery required. Programmable pumps are
for flexible medication delivery as dose titration and
regulation will vary due to the dynamic nature of the
patient. Programmable designs facilitate flexible dosing
options and precise dose titration over time.
An example of a flexible medication delivery pump is the
SynchroMed® electronic pump, manufactured by Medtronic Inc.
(Minneapolis, MN, USA). This pump contains a collapsible
reservoir that can be filled with 10 to 18 ml of liquid
medication and a peristaltic pump that pushes the medication
through a bacteriostatic filter and catheter into the spinal
canal.
Non-programmable pumps are for fixed rate medication
delivery when the dosage is expected to be stable. Possible
routes of administration include intravenous, intrahepatic,
intra-arterial, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, intrathecal,
epidural, and intraventricular.
An example of a fixed rate pump is the Infusaid Implantable
Infusion Pump, manufactured by Arrow International (Reading,
PA, USA). One chamber holds the medication and the other, a
charging fluid. Once inserted into the abdomen, the pump
regulates to the temperature of the body, leading to the
expansion of the charging fluid, which pressurizes the
medication chamber to push the drug through the catheter.
Fully Implantable Insulin Pumps
At the time of this writing, no implantable insulin pumps
have received FDA approval for marketing. The MiniMed® 2000
and MiniMed® 2001 implantable insulin pumps have been
granted investigational status and are currently being
evaluated in clinical trials.
Intrathecal Infusion Pumps
The intrathecal (IT) catheter is inserted through a needle
into the intraspinal space, usually at the lumbar or
thoracic level. The other end of the catheter is connected
to the pump and then filled with medication. The choice of
IT pump depends on the indications for intraspinal therapy,
the need for bolus versus continuous infusion, the available
support services, cost to the patient, and the patient's
general medical condition, ambulatory status and life
expectancy.
External programming is used to set the dosage, rate and
timing via telemetry to the pump. The pump needs to be
refilled every four to eight weeks by percutaneous
injection, depending on flow rate, and trained medical,
nursing or technical staff must perform the refilling
process.
September 3, 2008
Léger Survey reports 84 per cent of Ontario physicians feel patients may be addicted to prescription painkillers
September 3, 2008
Prescription painkiller dependence is a serious problem in Ontario, according to the results of a new survey conducted by Léger Marketing polling 211 Ontario General Practitioners. The survey reports that the majority of Ontario physicians (84%) feel that their patients may be addicted to commonly-prescribed painkillers.
More...
September 3, 2008
College freshmen: Pain killers and stimulants less risky than cocaine; more risky than marijuana
September 3, 2008
First year college students believe that occasional nonmedical use of prescription pain killers and stimulants is less risky than cocaine, but more risky than marijuana or consuming five or more alcoholic beverages every weekend, according to a new study published in the September issue of Prevention Science.
More...